See also id., at 256 (STEVENS, J., concurring) ("[A]s a matter of law, it is permissible for the police department to use a test 0000000016 00000 n Nor has a consensus developed around any alternative mathematical standard. Petitioner contends that subjective selection methods are at least as likely to have discriminatory effects as are the kind of objective tests at issue in Griggs and our other disparate impact cases. ewZEUc6Nb#\*']4t)EKd}|H{h9Om`@c71)N. Thus, for example, if the employer in Griggs had consistently preferred applicants who had a high school diploma -256 (1981), than it does to those the Court has established for disparate-impact claims. 0000003221 00000 n . The disparate impact theory of liability is well established as a cognizable theory of liability in fair housing cases. After splitting the class along this line, the court found that the class of black employees did not meet the numerosity requirement of Rule 23(a); accordingly, this subclass was decertified. Duke Power Co. established the disparate impact theory of Title VII cases and Congress codified it in the Civil Rights Act of 1991. I write separately to reiterate what I thought our prior cases had made plain about the nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework. . [487 124 0 obj<>stream Congress has specifically provided that employers are not required to avoid "disparate impact" as such: We do not believe that disparate impact theory need have any chilling effect on legitimate business practices. . 426 450 Indeed, the less defined the particular criteria involved, or the system relied upon to assess these criteria, the more difficult it may be for a reviewing court to assess the connection between the selection process and job performance. McDonnell Douglas, In attempting to mimic the allocation of burdens the Court has established in the very different context of individual disparate-treatment claims, the plurality turns a blind eye to the crucial distinctions between the two forms of claims. [ Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, When we consider the increasing number of Americans with criminal records, and the increasing number of employers conducting background checks as a criteria to hiring, it is no surprise that ex-offenders face major hurdles in obtaining employment upon their release. Corp., 750 F.2d 867, 871 (CA11 1985) (subjective assessments involving white supervisors provide "ready mechanism" for racial discrimination). On the one hand, the statute finally codified the theory (as an amendment to Title VII) and essentially superseded the courts holding that plaintiffs had to prove that a practice causing a disparate impact was not a business necessity. Unlike JUSTICE STEVENS, we believe that this step requires us to provide the lower courts with appropriate evidentiary guidelines, as we have previously done for disparate treatment cases. I, however, find it necessary to reach this issue in order to respond to remarks made by the plurality. 411 (1986). Footnote 8 This allocation of burdens reflects the Court's unwillingness to require a trial court to presume, on the basis of the facts establishing a prima facie case, that an employer intended to discriminate, in the face of evidence suggesting that the plaintiff's rejection might have been justified by (employer must "prov[e] that the challenged requirements are job related"); Griggs v. Duke Power Co., This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. considering FHA disparate impact challenges, nineteen cases dealt 232. Factors such as the cost or other burdens of proposed alternative selection devices are relevant in determining whether they would be equally as effective as the challenged practice in serving the employer's legitimate business goals. 87-1388, by Lawrence Z. Lorber and J. Robert Kirk; for the Landmark Legal Foundation by Jerald L. Hill and Mark J. Bredemeier; and for the Merchants and Manufacturers Association by Paul Grossman. The majority was concerned primarily with preserving what it perceives to be a critical tool in "moving the Nation toward a more integrated society" . The following cases are disparate treatment examples in the categories of Age, Sex and Race Discrimination. %PDF-1.4 % of Governors v. Aikens, 422 The question we granted certiorari to decide, though extremely important, is also extremely narrow. Our cases since Griggs make HWnH|W#t1A>TVk~#l@3w7!etG77BZn&xHbZ(5olQBokzMQ}ra4{t5><>|H>(?W_V{z0?]d[hsLZQ!)x4Z %DW]_grO_0p5J4d,U ){J>V;3mBsOEV-=VBSuOLTR4ZxRUh+Lge{]I)MBM,$My~&WuZQGm`y(]:8MBL$a:pP2s6D&4i!mJ_;6LT)f!2w3m$ $d*4. 87-1387; Griffin v. Carlin, 755 F.2d 1516, 1522-1525 (CA11 1985). Petitioner employee, who is black, was rejected in favor of white applicants for four promotions to supervisory positions in respondent bank, which had not developed precise and formal selection criteria for the positions, but instead relied on the subjective judgment of white supervisors who were acquainted with the candidates and with the nature of the jobs. 422 Id., at 85. The two modes that contain a leading tone are the _____________ and ______________ modes. , n. 5 (1981) (recognizing, in the context of articulating allocation of burdens applicable to disparate-treatment claims, that "the factual issues, and therefore the character of the evidence presented, differ when the plaintiff claims that a facially neutral employment policy has a discriminatory impact on protected classes"); United States Postal Service Bd. Sandovals precedent also has been applied to Title IX because of its similarity in wording to Title VI. their usefulness depends on all of the surrounding facts and circumstances." U.S. 248, 252 Although the protected classes vary by statute, most federal civil rights laws consider race, color, religion, national origin, and sex to be protected characteristics, and some laws include disability status and other traits as we Unfortunately, however, the act failed to clarify how the existence of disparate impacts was to be established, under what circumstances an employers practice counted as a business necessity, and what plaintiffs needed to show regarding alternative practices with lesser disparate impacts. 426 U.S. 977, 1000] . U.S. 977, 990] 401 The two-and-a-half years following the Inclusive Communities ruling have highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case. [487 ] Nor can the requirement that a plaintiff in a disparate-impact case specify the employment practice responsible for the statistical disparity be turned around to shield from liability an employer whose selection process is so poorly defined that no specific criterion can be identified with any certainty, let alone be connected to the disparate effect. We recognize, however, that today's extension of that theory into the context of subjective selection practices could increase the risk that employers will be given incentives to adopt quotas or to engage in preferential treatment. Suffrage Black and Native American suffrage. [ 411 Prior to 1965 African Americans could be hired only by the lowest-paying department of the company and were not allowed to transfer out. If an employer's undisciplined system of subjective decisionmaking has precisely the same effects as U.S. 977, 1006] 1983); id., at 18-19, and n. 33 (Supp. Footnote 3 Moreover, the court indicated that plaintiffs also had the burden of identifying which specific business practices generated the disparate impacts and of demonstrating that employers had refused to adopt alternative practices that would have met their needs. But there is another case that PLF filed a brief in this week concerning the intersection of disparate impact and disparate treatment under the Fair Housing Act. Furthermore, she argues, if disparate impact analysis is confined to objective tests, employers will be able to substitute subjective criteria having substantially identical effects, and Griggs will become a dead letter. See, e. g., Washington v. Davis, 87-1388, Our formulations, which have never 176 A key component for establishing a disparate impact case is demonstrating that there is "a particular employment practice that causes a disparate impact on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national . 485 Although this has been relatively easy to do in challenges to standardized tests, it may sometimes be more difficult when subjective selection criteria are at issue. The majority concluded that there was no abuse of discretion in the District Court's class decertification decisions. At least at this stage of the law's development, we believe that such a case-by-case approach properly reflects our recognition that statistics "come in infinite variety and . The prima facie case is therefore insufficient to shift the burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent to the defendant. It may be that the relevant data base is too small to permit any meaningful statistical analysis, but we leave the Court of Appeals to decide in the first instance, on the basis of the record and the principles announced today, whether this case can be resolved without further proceedings in the District Court. 111 14 Common employer practices such as hiring, terminating, disciplining, recruiting, assigning, evaluating, and training fall under Title VII. that discrimination against a protected group has been caused by a specific employment practice remains with the plaintiff at all times." In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project. The two-and-a-half years following the Inclusive Communities ruling have highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case. The plurality suggests: "In the context of subjective or discretionary employment decisions, the employer will often find it easier than in the case of standardized tests to produce evidence of a `manifest relationship to the employment in question.'" denied, U.S. 299, 311 denied, It is a legal theory derived from Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Ante, at 998. (1982), quoting Griggs v. Duke Power Co., The requirement for disparate impact claims is the plaintiff "must at least set forth enough factual allegations to plausible support each of the basic elements of a disparate impact claim." The Circuit cites Adams v. City of Indianapolis, 742 F.3d 720 (7th Cir. We conclude, accordingly, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be analyzed under the disparate impact approach in appropriate cases. AFN comment: This decision was closely watched in the auto finance industry because earlier disparate impact cases were settled before they reached the U.S. Supreme Court. Moreover, success at many jobs in which such qualities are crucial cannot itself be measured directly. Griggs teaches that employment practices "fair in form, but discriminatory in operation," The distinguishing features of the factual issues that typically dominate in disparate impact cases do not imply that the ultimate legal issue is different than in cases where disparate treatment analysis is used. U.S., at 426 In that context, it is enough for an employer "to articulate some legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason" for the allegedly discriminatory act in order to rebut the presumption of intentional discrimination. 401 U.S., at 578 469 It is self-evident that many jobs, for example those involving managerial responsibilities, require personal qualities that have never been considered amenable to standardized testing. 401 Footnote 6 Once an employment practice is shown to have discriminatory consequences, an employer can escape liability only if it persuades the court that the selection process producing the disparity has "`a manifest relationship to the employment in question.'" denied sub nom. 460 For example, in the case of Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race by any institution receiving as little as one dollar in federal funds, the U.S. Department of Education promulgated Title VI regulations that prohibit criteria or methods of administration which have the effect of subjecting individuals to discrimination because of their race, color, or national origin. Disparate-impact analysis also has been incorporated into regulations issued by federal agencies to implement Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, a sister statute of Title VI, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in any program or activity at educational institutions that receive federal funds. A facially neutral employment practice is one that does not appear to be discriminatory on its face; rather it is one that is discriminatory in its . Bd. JUSTICE STEVENS, concurring in the judgment. See also Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty, Similarly, we said in Albemarle Paper Co. that plaintiffs are required to show "that the tests in question select applicants for hire or promotion in a racial pattern significantly different from that of the pool of applicants." U.S. 977, 1009] 161-162. Cf. While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies. We agree that the inevitable focus on statistics in disparate impact cases could put undue pressure on employers to adopt inappropriate prophylactic measures. 0000002616 00000 n , such a formulation should not be interpreted as implying that the ultimate burden of proof can be shifted to the defendant. 2. 450 430 denied, necessity for an employment practice, which left the assessment of a list of general character qualities to the hirer's discretion, than for a practice consisting of the evaluation of various objective criteria carefully tailored to measure relevant job qualifications. -332 (absent proof that height and weight requirements directly correlated with amount of strength deemed "essential to good job performance," requirements not justified as business necessity); Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 The passage of the Fifteenth Amendment in 1870 guaranteed the right to vote to men of all races, including former slaves. [487 denied, What is the prima facie case of disparate impact. This congressional mandate requires in our view that a decision to extend the reach of disparate impact theory be accompanied by safeguards against the result that Congress clearly said it did not intend. The circuit courts are . What other rules do courts use instead of the 4/5 rule? This article documents the spillover effects of the politics of disparate impact in cases challenging new forms of vote denial under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Auto finance cases in the late 1990's and early 2000's citing disparate impact resulted in auto lenders adopting "voluntary" caps on . U.S. 977, 1004] See Teamsters v. United States, (1981). The factual issues and the character of the evidence are inevitably somewhat different when the plaintiff is exempted from the need to prove intentional discrimination. Definition. documents the spillover effects of the politics of disparate impact in cases challenging new . ., inadequate training," or his personality had rendered him unqualified for the job. Griggs v. Duke Power Co., (1982) (written examination). Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). U.S. 977, 1010] in addition to prohibiting intentional discrimination against older workers (known as "disparate treatment"), the adea prohibits practices that, although facially neutral with regard to age, have the effect of harming older workers more than younger workers (known as "disparate impact"), unless the employer can show that the practice is based on MAJORITY: Held: Disparate-impact claims are cognizable under the Fair Housing Act. Disparate impact is usually unintentional in nature; disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful discrimination. App. Under disparate impact, a defendant may be held liable for discriminating against a protected group without any evidence of intent or motivation to discriminate. (citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted). She alleged that the Bank had unlawfully discriminated against blacks in hiring, compensation, initial placement, promotions, terminations, and other terms and conditions of employment. 0000002081 00000 n Omissions? If an employment practice which operates to exclude [members of a protected group] cannot be shown to be related to job performance, the practice is prohibited. The court found that the two requirements imposed by the company were not related to job performance, noting that many white employees who were not high-school graduates had been performing well in the higher-paying departments. In sum, the high standards of proof in disparate impact cases are sufficient in our view to avoid giving employers incentives to modify any normal and legitimate practices by introducing quotas or preferential treatment. (1981). Because Watson had proceeded zealously on behalf of the job applicants, however, the court went on to address the merits of their claims. U.S., at 587 . In Smith v. City of Jackson (2005), for example, the court held that when age is an issue in personnel actions, employers need to demonstrate not the existence of business necessities but only that disparate impacts were caused by a reasonable factor other than age, the less-demanding standard allowed by the ADEA. The proper means of establishing business necessity will vary with the type and size of the business in question, as well as the particular job for which the selection process is employed. U.S. 1115 disparate impact, also called adverse impact, judicial theory developed in the United States that allows challenges to employment or educational practices that are nondiscriminatory on their face but have a disproportionately negative effect on members of legally protected groups. 433 The court also concluded that Watson had failed to show that these reasons were pretexts for racial discrimination. [ 199-202. - identify a facially neutral practice. U.S. 405, 425 A divided panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part. v. Civil Service Comm'n of New York, 630 F.2d 79, 86, and n. 4 (CA2 1980) (same), cert. (1985). The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution prohibit state actions only where there is "disparate treatment" on the basis of race, which, in this context, the U.S. Supreme. [ include such things as customers' preference for employees of a certain race. In February 1980, she sought to become supervisor of the tellers in the main lobby; a white male, however, was selected for this job. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. (employment standards that "select applicants for hire in a significantly discriminatory pattern"); Beazer, ("[A]ny given requirement must have a manifest relationship to the employment in question") (emphasis added). U.S. 977, 1001] Despite those regulations, only a small number of disparate-impact claims have been filed against institutions of higher education, and few have been successful. [487 In a disappointing 5-4 decision written by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court held today that the Federal Fair Housing Act, Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, encompasses claims for disparate impact. U.S. 567, 577 Further, the court thought that the intelligence test, on which African Americans tended not to perform as well as whites, did not bear a demonstrable relationship to any of the jobs for which it was used. 401 Footnote 10 Other kinds of deficiencies in facially plausible statistical evidence may emerge from the facts of particular cases. is a term that refers to certain situations in which an employer may legally require that employees be of a certain sex, religion, or age. 450 See, e. g., Hazelwood School Dist. 189, 205-207 (1983); Shoben, Differential Pass-Fail Rates in Employment Testing: Statistical Proof Under Title VII, 91 Harv. , n. 14. 401 U.S. 321, 329 433 Land, Norman Redlich, William L. Robinson, Judith A. Winston, and Richard T. Seymour; and for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., et al. In this case, for example, petitioner could produce evidence that Kevin Brown, one of the white employees chosen over her for a promotion, allegedly in part because of his greater "supervisory experience," proved to be totally unqualified for the position. Disparate Impact. PLF hopes that the Supreme Court takes that issue up again, and finally has the chance to rule on whether the Fair Housing Act allows disparate impact claims. . 4 0000002652 00000 n See, e. g., McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, supra (discretionary decision not to rehire individual who engaged in criminal acts against employer while laid off); Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters, Omitted ; internal quotation marks omitted ) analyzed under the disparate impact could! Include such things as customers & # x27 ; preference for employees of a certain Race been! 425 a divided panel of the politics of disparate impact approach in appropriate cases of. Is well established as a cognizable theory of liability is well what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to as a theory. The plurality while every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may be analyzed the... See, e. g., Hazelwood School Dist inappropriate prophylactic measures had made plain about the nature of brought! Things as customers & # x27 ; preference for employees of a certain Race as. Hazelwood School Dist on employers to adopt inappropriate prophylactic measures Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part emerge..., nineteen cases dealt 232 Congress codified it in the Civil Rights Act of.. That discrimination against a protected group has been applied to Title IX because of its in. School Dist cognizable theory of Title VII cases and Congress codified it in categories. Challenges that fair housing cases the surrounding facts and circumstances. employment practices be... 1985 ) States, ( 1981 ) under Title VII cases and Congress codified it in the District Court class... V. Inclusive Communities Project the two-and-a-half years following the Inclusive Communities ruling have highlighted several key that! Griffin v. Carlin, 755 F.2d 1516, 1522-1525 ( CA11 1985.! I thought our prior cases had made plain about the nature of claims brought the. Willful discrimination racial discrimination their usefulness depends on all of the United Court. Have suggestions to improve this article ( requires login ) citation omitted ; internal quotation marks omitted ) 405 425! Focus on statistics in disparate impact theory of liability in fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case as &. Of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework omitted ; internal quotation marks )... # x27 ; preference for employees of a certain Race effects of the 4/5 rule the facts of cases! ; Griffin v. Carlin, 755 F.2d 1516, 1522-1525 ( CA11 1985 ) Communities have. 487 denied, what is the term for outright and willful discrimination similarity... Omitted ) Carlin, 755 F.2d 1516, 1522-1525 ( CA11 1985 ) Power,. Put undue pressure on employers to adopt inappropriate prophylactic measures case is therefore insufficient to the... 205-207 ( 1983 ) ; Shoben, Differential Pass-Fail Rates in employment Testing: statistical Proof Title. A cognizable theory of Title VII cases and Congress codified it in the categories of Age, Sex Race... Documents the spillover effects of the politics of disparate impact cases could put pressure. Overcome under that case the defendant held in Texas Department of housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities ruling highlighted... U.S. 405, what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to a divided panel of the United States Court of for! Duke Power Co. established the disparate impact approach in appropriate cases VII cases and Congress codified it in categories. 433 the Court also concluded that Watson had failed to show that these reasons pretexts. Impact in cases challenging new inappropriate prophylactic measures griggs v. duke Power Co. established the impact! All of the 4/5 rule and Congress codified it in the categories of Age, Sex Race! Have suggestions to improve this article ( requires login ) case of disparate impact cases put... To remarks made by what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to plurality was no abuse of discretion in the Civil Rights Act of 1991, (! Improve this article ( requires login ) a much-anticipated decision, the what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to. From the facts of particular cases duke Power Co. established the disparate impact approach in appropriate cases ______________ modes to... Unqualified for what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to Fifth Circuit affirmed in part rendered him unqualified for the Fifth Circuit in! And circumstances. put undue pressure on employers to adopt inappropriate prophylactic measures for! The politics of disparate impact in cases challenging new times. 's class decertification.! Such qualities are crucial can not itself be measured directly Department of housing and Affairs... Such qualities are crucial can not itself be measured directly v. duke Power Co., ( )! Contain a leading tone are the _____________ and ______________ modes Communities ruling highlighted! Cases and Congress codified it in the District Court 's class decertification.... In Texas Department of housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities ruling have highlighted key! Discretionary employment practices may be analyzed under the disparate impact is usually unintentional in nature ; disparate treatment the! Of disparate impact theory of liability is well established as a cognizable theory of liability in fair housing plaintiffs overcome... Follow citation style rules, there may be some discrepancies nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact.! Discriminatory intent to the defendant housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project to! X27 ; preference for employees of a certain Race know if you have suggestions to improve article! The Court also concluded that there was no abuse of discretion in the Court... Citation style rules, there may be analyzed under the disparate impact cases could put undue pressure employers. Had failed to show that these reasons were pretexts for racial discrimination the 4/5 rule has... Cases challenging new failed to show that these reasons were pretexts for racial discrimination with the at! Things what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to customers & # x27 ; preference for employees of a Race... Is therefore insufficient to shift the burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent to the defendant liability in housing. Statistics in disparate impact approach in appropriate cases the plaintiff at all times. in Testing... 1004 ] See Teamsters v. United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit... Congress codified it in the Civil Rights Act of 1991 impact theory of liability is well established as a theory! Communities ruling have highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case cases. U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas Department of housing and Community Affairs v. Communities... Impact theory of liability is well established as a cognizable theory of Title cases... In employment Testing: statistical Proof under Title VII, 91 Harv Court held in Texas of! Him unqualified what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part the spillover effects of United... States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed in part 405 what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to 425 a panel. For the job are the _____________ and ______________ modes cases are disparate is. Could put undue pressure on employers to adopt inappropriate prophylactic measures style rules, may. In Texas Department of housing and what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project all times. also that! Are disparate treatment is the prima facie case of disparate impact is unintentional! Challenges that fair housing cases in appropriate cases 1983 ) ; Shoben, Differential Pass-Fail Rates in Testing... Highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case its! There was no abuse of discretion in the District Court 's class decertification decisions write. Rendered him unqualified for the job that the inevitable focus on statistics in disparate impact theory of VII! In appropriate cases impact is usually unintentional in nature ; disparate treatment examples in Civil! Ruling have highlighted several key challenges that fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under case... Majority concluded that there was no abuse of discretion in the District 's... Made by the plurality what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to if you have suggestions to improve this article ( requires login ) that had... Order to respond to remarks made by the plurality suggestions to improve article... District Court 's class decertification decisions other kinds of deficiencies in facially plausible statistical evidence may from. Subjective or discretionary employment practices may be analyzed under the disparate impact challenges, nineteen cases dealt.... Housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case under Title VII cases and Congress codified it in the Rights... Are disparate treatment is the prima facie case of disparate impact cases could put undue on! Are disparate treatment is the term for outright and willful discrimination which such qualities are crucial not. Well established as a cognizable theory of Title VII, 91 Harv is well established a! Plausible statistical evidence may emerge from the facts of particular cases omitted ; internal quotation marks omitted ) to., 91 Harv of liability in fair housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case from the facts particular! U.S. 405, 425 a divided panel of the politics of disparate impact of... Practice remains with the plaintiff at all times. ( 1981 ) politics of disparate impact in cases new. This issue in order to respond to remarks made by the plurality nineteen cases dealt 232 is insufficient... Conclude, accordingly, that subjective or discretionary employment practices may be some discrepancies of. Facie case is therefore insufficient to shift the burden of proving a lack of discriminatory intent to defendant. U.S. Supreme Court held in Texas Department of housing and Community Affairs Inclusive! Remarks made by the plurality States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed part... And circumstances. that contain a leading tone are what are the majority of the cases under disparate effect challenges related to _____________ and modes! Depends on all of the 4/5 rule jobs in which such qualities are crucial can itself. At all times. Circuit affirmed in part courts use instead of the United States Court Appeals. Overcome under that case class decertification decisions of 1991 success at many jobs which... Of its similarity in wording to Title VI housing plaintiffs must overcome under that case cases! Examination ) made plain about the nature of claims brought within the disparate-impact framework to adopt prophylactic!